Wealth Management

Private infrastructure, once limited to institutions and ultra-wealthy investors, is quickly becoming more accessible as new funds open to individuals through financial advisors. A recent BlackRock survey found that nearly a third of wealthy family offices plan to expand or begin infrastructure allocations, reflecting growing confidence in the sector’s stability and income potential. 

 

Demand is fueled by themes like artificial intelligence, which drives the need for more data centers and energy capacity, alongside global investment in essential assets like transportation and communications networks. 

 

These strategies contrast with infrastructure ETFs and mutual funds, which focus on public equities tied to the sector and tend to prioritize growth over income.


Finsum:  While private funds offer higher potential yields through the “illiquidity premium,” investors must weigh their limited liquidity and longer investment horizons.

Two leading proxy advisors, ISS and Glass Lewis, have partnered with the Catholic University of America (CUA) to create investment voting guidelines grounded in the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) principles. The collaboration, led by CUA professors Andrew Abela and Nicholas Schmitz, aims to ensure that investors’ proxy votes align with Catholic moral and social teachings. 

 

Under the new framework, proposals that conflict with Church doctrine—such as those funding abortion or gender-transition procedures—will be opposed, while issues without clear moral guidance will defer to company management or abstain.

 

After discussions with CUA, both firms recognized demand for authentic faith-based voting services and agreed to develop new policies faithful to Church doctrine. 


Finsum: The guidelines, can help advisors of build better connection for clients of faith, by offering an ESG alternative. 

Collective Investment Trusts (CITs) are becoming increasingly prevalent in retirement plans, with over 78% of defined contribution (DC) plans offering them, making them the second most common investment option after mutual funds. CITs serve as cost-effective, tax-exempt pooled investment vehicles offered through banks or trust companies, delivering many benefits of institutional accounts alongside accessibility for retirement plans. 

 

Compared to mutual funds, CITs often feature lower administrative and compliance costs, and their fee flexibility and eligibility for smaller plans enhance their appeal for sponsors and advisors. They are available only to qualified retirement plans under ERISAand are not open to IRAs or certain other tax-advantaged arrangements

 

 While CITs may mirror mutual fund strategies, slight performance differences can arise due to varying fee structures, cash flows, and corporate-wrapper mechanics. 


Finsum: Fiduciaries should consider the switch from mutual funds to CITs, the transition process is relatively straightforward.

Page 3 of 376

Contact Us

Newsletter

Subscribe

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Top