Tech

(Seattle)

Amazon’s plans for newly acquired Whole Foods are becoming clear. While the big wonder is how Amazon may use the grocer in its distribution plans, two things have now become clear. Firstly, Amazon is seeking to turn Whole Foods into a more disciplined and competitive store, firstly by cutting prices, and now, by consolidating power over merchandising decisions. Whole Foods formerly ran a more fragmented model where individual store operators had much more control over which products they ran, but Amazon is pulling that back.


FINSUM: We did not expect Amazon to run Whole Foods in such a different way, and we don’t think the market did either. We expected that they just wanted the store to enhance their food distribution efforts, but they obviously want Whole Foods to be a strong standalone grocer.

(London)

In what seems likely to prove both a big headache and a substantial earnings loss for Uber, the city of London has just announced that it is revoking the company’s license to operate in the city. London’s transport unit has declined to renew the company’s license and has the mayor’s full backing. The city says that Uber’s behavior as a company has not been “fit and proper” and that they have not taken safety seriously enough. The company says it will challenge the decision in the courts. Its current license will expire on September 30th.


FINSUM: It will be interesting to see if other major cities follow suit on this. Uber’s new CEO sure has a lot on his plate!

(San Francisco)

A distinguished law professor from Texas A&M has put out an article arguing that investors should stop worrying so much about a new crisis erupting on Wall Street and start paying attention to the one brewing in Fintech. William Magnuson contends that Fintech, the young financial technology sector, is where the next crisis will come from. The sector has come to grab a major position in the financial industry and is led from Silicon Valley, not New York. Its structure makes it uniquely exposed to a crisis, says Magnuson. For instance, its younger and less-well-capitalized businesses are more susceptible to quick failures (like Mt Gox in 2014), and its companies have no sense of coming together for the greater good to solve a crisis. Finally, its young technologies are less well-regulated and more opaque (making them harder to monitor).


FINSUM: So we agree that Fintech could be the epicenter of a crisis, but not any time soon. Fintech, even counting Bitcoin, is not integrated into the economy or market enough to cause a crisis. And on top of that, what is the catalyst for a meltdown?

Page 1 of 39

Contact Us

Newsletter

Subscribe

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Top
We use cookies to improve our website. By continuing to use this website, you are giving consent to cookies being used. More details…