Wealth Management

Small-cap stocks, typically valued between $250 million and $2 billion, are regaining popularity among investors after years of underperformance. Economic growth plays a significant role in this resurgence, as smaller firms tend to benefit more from increased consumer and business spending. 

 

Additionally, the Federal Reserve's recent rate cuts are expected to lower borrowing costs, a crucial factor for small businesses that rely heavily on credit. Another driver of renewed interest is valuation—many analysts believe small caps are undervalued compared to their larger counterparts. 

 

For investors seeking exposure while mitigating risk, small-cap ETFs like Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK), iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG), and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) offer diversification and professional management. 


Finsum: With economic growth in recent quarters, small caps may continue to gain traction in the coming years.

 

In 2024, travel transformed with AI-assisted trip planning, a resurgence of luxury train journeys, and a growing emphasis on wellness through solitude and stargazing. Urban explorers embraced green spaces and foraged dining, while music enthusiasts traveled extensively for live performances. 

 

As 2025 approaches, the focus will shift toward deeper, experience-driven adventures. Literature-inspired tourism is on the rise, with book festivals attracting larger crowds and hotels celebrating their literary connections. 

 

Astrocartography is gaining traction, guiding travelers to destinations aligned with their personal astrological charts. Meanwhile, honeymoons are becoming more immersive, with newlyweds favoring extended, meaningful getaways over traditional weeklong retreats.


Finsum: While everyone is implementing AI to improve efficiency, don’t forget to leverage it for personal matters such as gift and vacation ideas. 

 

The debate over custodial pricing continues, with many questioning whether bundling all revenue sources into a single fee is fair. Since custodians don’t face significantly higher costs for a $10 million account versus a $100,000 one, a pay-for-services-used model may be more equitable. 

 

Another pressing issue is the slow adoption of automated onboarding, as many custodians still require paper forms and wet signatures despite available digital alternatives. Some speculate that firms hesitate to streamline transfers because it would make it easier for advisors to switch custodians, reducing client stickiness. 

 

Beyond pricing and onboarding, factors like service quality, cost, and additional features—such as dedicated support teams or integrated technology—shape custodian selection. 


Finsum: As the industry evolves, understanding these priorities will be key to creating a more efficient and competitive custodial marketplace.

Page 11 of 336

Contact Us

Newsletter

Subscribe

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Top