Wealth Management
Following the abysmal performance of stocks and bonds in 2022, it’s understandable that alternative investments have been gaining strong traction over the past year. Moreso when considering that alternatives delivered better returns while reducing volatility.
In a CNBC article, Kate Dore discusses survey results from the Financial Planning Association that show nearly 30% of advisors are investing in ‘alternatives’ for their clients. These advisors mentioned diversification, lower portfolio risk, and higher returns as major factors in this decision.
In contrast, 30% of advisors are aware of alternative investments but are electing to not put client funds in these vehicles. Many of these advisors cited higher fees and expenses, lower liquidity, higher borrowing costs, and a lack of transparency as major concerns. Another concern is that clients are not able to easily access these funds in case of an emergency.
There’s a wide disparity in the asset class as it includes a variety of categories like hedge funds, private equity, real estate, commodities, and structured products. Therefore, even more due diligence is required given lower levels of regulation and oversight.
Finsum: Alternative investments are increasingly being embraced by advisors, especially after their strong performance in 2022. However, some continue to eschew the category due to a variety of concerns.
In an article for ThinkAdvisor, John Manganaro shares some concerning research that shows most advisors are not preparing for succession planning and that it poses a significant threat to the industry. It’s also commonly cited as a risk by the leaders of various advisories as there are forecasts of a massive wave of retirements by advisors over the next decade.
Many are incorrectly assuming that they will be able to gracefully exit the business and hand over their clients to the next generation. Yet, this is easier said than done since it assumes that the incoming advisor will have the talent and ability to serve clients and help them reach their financial goals.
There are additional challenges such as many clients may not be comfortable with younger or newer advisors and elect to go elsewhere. Often, relationships between the retiring advisor and the newer one can fray over questions about leadership, compensation, and the financial structure of the new arrangement.
It’s ironic because advisors intuitively believe in long-term planning to help their clients reach their goals. Yet, many are not doing the same for their practices.
Finsum: Financial advisors need to embrace long-term planning to ensure a successful exit with the same diligence that they help their clients build a plan to reach their financial goals.
In an article for USNews, Tony Dong covers the opportunity for investors in high-yield fixed income and equity ETFs. Currently, investors can lock in risk-free yields above 5% due to rates being at their highest level in decades.
However, these short-term rates are not likely to linger at these levels for a long period of time due to inflation peaking and now starting to roll over as well as increasing risk of a recession. Although there is divided opinion on which outcome will prevail, the reality is that either scenario will result in lower rates and yields.
For investors who don’t believe that a recession will materialize, they should be salivating at the prospect of buying a high-yield fixed income or equity ETF to lock in these yields. These ETFs offer higher yields than Treasuries, but they also offer the potential for appreciation if economic growth surprises to the upside.
For instance, the Invesco Fundamental High Yield Corporate Bond ETF is a diversified basket of high-yield, corporate bonds. These are riskier than investment-grade bonds but less so than equities. Currently, it pays a yield of 6.7% with an expense ratio of 0.5%.
Finsum: Investors should consider taking advantage of the highest rates seen in decades through high-yield ETFs.
More...
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Blackrock CEO Larry Fink surprised many when he said that he will no longer use the term ‘ESG’ because it had been misappropriated by the far left and the far right. Of course, Blackrock and Fink have been one of the leading proponents of the movement and used their station as one of the world’s largest asset managers to push corporations to consider these factors when making decisions.
Now, many conservatives are pushing back and want to end the consideration of ESG factors when making investment decisions. At the state level, legislation has already been passed in many red states to ban ESG investing by state funds. Florida actually pulled $2 billion out of Blackrock funds to protest its ESG stance.
Fink’s verbal retreat is an acknowledgement of these forces, but it’s uncertain whether this is simply a rhetorical change or a change in behavior. Previously, Fink has spoken passionately about the risks that climate change poses to companies and the importance of governance and diversity at the highest levels. He believes that long-term financial results are enhanced by considering these factors in decision-making by executives.
Finsum: Blackrock CEO Larry Fink is one of the original and most passionate believers in ESG investing. However due to recent political blowback, he has said that he will stop using the term.
Following a couple of quiet months in terms of financial advisor recruiting, there’s been another surge in activity in terms of M&A for RIAs as covered by Ali Hibbs for WealthManagement. It’s not a coincidence that this renewal in appetites is happening along with a resurgence in ‘animal spirits’ due to strong stock market gains and constructive developments on the economic and inflation front.
Commensurately, Cetera Holdings which is the parent company of Cetera Financial Group, acquired The Retirement Planning Group (TRPG). TRPG is a firm with 14 advisors and 40 employees with headquarters in Kansas City and offices in St. Louis and Denver. It marks the first pure RIA acquisition by Cetera, but it wasn’t exactly surprising given the recent arrival of former Fidelity senior executive Mike Durbin as CEO. As of the end of Q1, Cetera had $330 billion in assets under administration and $116 billion in assets under management.
According to Durbin, the deal is accretive for Cetera and ‘represents our commitment to constantly identify and deliver multiple options that give advisors a depth of choice and flexibility to affiliate their business with Cetera.’ Earlier this year, Cetera made minority investments in Prosperity Advisors and NetVEST Financial. It also acquired the retail wealth business of Securian Financial Group.
Finsum: M&A activity is picking up once again in the RIA space after a couple of months of less activity. The most high-profile is Cetera’s acquisition of The Retirement Planning Group.
In an article for Citywire, David Stevenson discusses whether active fixed income or equity ETFs will displace mutual funds. Already, passive equity funds have replaced mutual funds as the preferred vehicle for investors and institutions given lower costs, more transparency, and better returns over long time periods.
On the fixed income side, it’s a bit more challenging given that active funds have a track record of outperforming passive funds. In large part, this is because active funds have more latitude in terms of duration and credit quality that are not available to passive funds.
However, Stevenson is skeptical that active ETFs will be able to completely replace mutual funds. He sees many active ETFs as being mutual funds in an ‘ETF package’ with a slightly lower fee. He is also skeptical that active fixed income will continue to outperform over the long-term.
As evidence, he cites the lack of inflows into active ETFs despite a spate of launches over the past year. So far, active funds only account for 5.8% of assets under management, while passive makes up the rest. Of this, active fixed income ETFs have seen 9% of total bond flows, totaling only $8.5 billion, while passive fixed fixed income ETFs have seen $75 billion of inflows.
Finsum: Active fixed income funds have performed well YTD but still are not seeing significant inflows despite a number of new issues in the past year.