Model portfolios have been gaining ground with advisors. Close to $350 billion in assets sat in model portfolios as of March 2022, according to a Morningstar report in June. That’s a 22% increase over the prior nine months. But how do advisors incorporate model portfolios into their business? In a recent article, ThinkAdvisor asked different advisors how models fit in their practice. Erik Nero, founder, and president, of First Step Wealth Planning LLC, thinks they are a boost to small firms. He uses them for close to all of his clients except the client portfolios that need more customization. Kyle Simmons, lead financial planner, at Simmons Investment Management uses his own model portfolio but warns advisors not to get attached to models, as clients can come in with legacy holdings and tax consequences. Jan Pevzner, principal, of Gotham Block LLC finds models to be a great starting point for a “generic client” as it can save you a lot of time. Jon Ulin, CEO of Ulin & Co. Wealth Management uses models in addition to comprehensive planning for clients, which isn’t typically provided by robo-advisors. Nate Creviston, manager of wealth management and portfolio analysis, at Capital Advisors, does not use model portfolios at all as they lack tax awareness and believes each client deserves a customized portfolio unique to their needs and goals.

Finsum: With model portfolios gaining ground with advisors, ThinkAdvisor interviewed several advisors on how models fit or don’t fit into their practice.

On Tuesday, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced its examination priorities for 2023. The agency said it is going to focus on Regulation Best Interest, ESG, the new marketing rule, and a host of other issues. When it comes to investigating Reg BI violations, the SEC will zero in on advisors’ recommendations on complex investments such as derivatives and leveraged ETFs, and high-cost and illiquid products such as annuities and nontraded REITs. According to the division, SEC examiners analyzing Reg BI will look at investment advice and recommendations, disclosures made to clients, the processes firms have in place for making best-interest recommendations, and the kind of factors that are considered in light of an investor’s profile, including their goals and account characteristics. The report stated, “Examinations may also focus on recommendations or advice to certain types of investors, such as senior investors and those saving for retirement, and specific account recommendations, such as retirement account rollovers and 529 plans.” The division will also be focusing on the SEC’s new marketing rule, which reached its compliance date last November after taking effect in May 2021. Examiners will be looking at whether advisors have adopted written rules and procedures that “are reasonably designed” to prevent rule violations. Several experts also believe that SEC examiners will expect firms to apply Reg BI standards to ESG recommendations.

Finsum:The SEC's Examinations Division released its annual Exam Priorities this week, detailing its areas of focus for 2023, which includes Reg BI, ESG, and the new marketing rule.

There’s no question that ETFs are a popular way to gain access to the market. They’re low-cost and tax efficient when compared to mutual funds. But, according to a new research paper, ETFs are not the most profitable after taxes are paid. That distinction belongs to large baskets of individual stocks that aren't found in a fund. The paper, which was posted recently by Roni Israelov, the president and chief investment officer of NDVR, and Jason Lu, a research economist in the economic modeling division of the International Monetary Fund, sought to quantify tax-loss harvesting, the strategy of selling losing assets to offset taxable gains that arise when selling winning ones. The paper found that tax-loss harvesting produced the best results when it's used for groups of individual stocks, not ETFs. In a recent interview, Israelov said "You make more money harvesting single stocks across an entire portfolio than you do in an ETF." The paper adds to a growing body of wealth management firms that have been promoting the merits of tax-loss harvesting and boosting the case for direct indexing, a strategy in which investors chose a basket of securities that mirror an index, but is personalized to their specifications.

Finsum: A new research paper found that tax-loss harvesting produced the best results when it's used for groups of individual stocks, not ETFs, boosting the case for direct indexing.