Wealth Management

Investors have continued to pull billions from ESG (environmental, social, and governance) funds in early 2025, amid growing political backlash and shifting federal policies under President Trump’s administration. 

 

In the first quarter alone, ESG funds saw $6.1 billion in outflows, marking the tenth straight quarter of declines, according to Morningstar. Much of this retreat has been attributed to the administration’s aggressive rollback of climate and DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) initiatives, including pulling out of the Paris Agreement and cutting subsidies for green energy. 

 

Despite political resistance, ESG investing remains popular among younger investors and retains institutional support, particularly in pro-ESG states like California. Analysts argue ESG strategies still offer long-term value, positioning investors in companies better equipped to handle emerging environmental and social risks. 


Finsum: Advocates maintain it's a smart approach to building resilience and returns in an evolving global economy, and necessary to combat emerging environmental issues. 

While overall annuity sales have cooled slightly from their post-pandemic highs, persistent economic unease may be fueling renewed demand. In Q1 2025, total annuity sales reached $105.4 billion—just 1% below the all-time high recorded in the same quarter last year, according to LIMRA. 

 

The organization attributes this strength to rising consumer anxiety, which in March drove sales to their second-highest monthly total on record. Registered index-linked annuities (RILAs) continued to shine, with sales up 21% year over year, bolstered by product innovation and growing interest from both insurers and investors. 

 

Meanwhile, fixed indexed annuities saw a 7% decline but still posted the fifth-highest quarterly sales ever at $26.7 billion. 


Finsum: For those looking for security with some upside in their retirement portfolios annuities products could provide an outlet. 

U.S. farmers are facing a sharp drop in soybean and pork exports to China just as planting season ramps up, signaling serious trouble ahead. With China previously accounting for a major share of demand, especially for these two products, the sudden decline in sales — some dropping more than 70% — is hitting a fragile agricultural sector hard. 

 

The current trade dispute, now broader and more severe than the 2018 tariff standoff, comes with no clear support for producers and is compounded by related conflicts with other trade partners like Canada. This creates a supply chain crunch, not just at the point of export but also in key input materials like fertilizer, making the hit to farmers multifaceted. 

 

Domestic consumption isn’t likely to absorb the surplus either, especially as U.S. demand for pork remains soft and efforts like increasing biodiesel requirements are not enough to offset lost international sales. 


For many growers, the loss of access to a market of over a billion consumers could be a lasting blow with no easy substitute.

Page 2 of 337

Contact Us

Newsletter

Subscribe

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Top