Wealth Management

Although the term “ESG” has become controversial and sometimes viewed as a marketing label, about 69% of institutional asset owners still report using it—primarily for consistency. Many prefer alternative labels: 57% use “sustainable investment,” 53% “sustainability,” and 52% “responsible investment.” 

 

ESG considerations now apply to an average of 44% of asset owners’ AUM globally, up from 42% last year. In 2025, 20% of respondents said they apply ESG to more than 75% of their portfolios, and 10% said ESG applies to 100% of their assets. 

 

Asset owners increasingly see ESG as aligned with fiduciary duty: 61% agree ESG supports that role, up from 53% in 2024. 


Finsum: The biggest barrier to broader ESG adoption is concern over impacts on investment returns or a lack of standardized data and reporting. 

IsoEnergy’s merger with Toro Energy adds the fully owned Wiluna uranium project in Western Australia to its portfolio, expanding its global footprint and resource base. The combined company will hold an estimated 55.2 million pounds of measured and indicated uranium resources, along with 4.9 million pounds inferred.

 

IsoEnergy CEO Philip Williams said the acquisition enhances the company’s position with a large, permitted project in a top uranium-producing region amid surging global nuclear demand. Toro shareholders will own about 7.1% of the new entity and gain exposure to IsoEnergy’s assets in Canada and the U.S., including the high-grade Hurricane deposit and Utah-based mines. 

 

The merger arrives as uranium markets strengthen, with global demand projected to rise roughly 30% by 2030 and double by 2040. 


Finsum: This merger could be a good opportunity for those looking to invest in nuclear energy or uranium. 

At large brokerage firms, many financial advisors are realizing they don’t truly own their client relationships, limiting their autonomy and ability to serve clients freely. Over time, firms have tightened control through reduced payouts, restrictive policies, and the withdrawal of major players which once made advisor transitions easier. 

 

The traditional model has grown more corporate and centralized, leaving advisors to shoulder rising complexity while firms capture more of the value their clients generate. 

 

Meanwhile, the independent RIA space now offers the infrastructure, technology, and compliance support that used to be available only at large firms — but with far greater flexibility and ownership. Modern platforms and advanced tech stacks empower independent advisors to scale efficiently and serve clients on their own terms. 


Finsum: With clients increasingly loyal to their advisors rather than the firms themselves, independence no longer seems as risky. 

Page 1 of 368

Contact Us

Newsletter

Subscribe

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Top