About 14% of advisors are aware of and recommend direct indexing solutions to their clients which is the primary reason that its forecast to grow faster than ETFs over the next decade. In a recent article by Allen Roth of WealthLogic, he discusses the pros and cons of direct indexing and compares it to ETFs.

Direct indexing has many of the same characteristics as ETFs such as allowing exposure to broad categories and having low costs. However, it allows for greater customization that can allow for portfolios that are more tailored to a client’s needs. 

Another distinct  advantage of direct indexing are that it allows for tax-loss harvesting which can offset capital gains. This strategy can allow for an additional 0.2 to 1% of returns and is more beneficial in down years. 

In terms of disadvantages, many of the most popular ETFs have less costs than direct indexing. For example, the most popular S&P 500 ETFs have annual expenses of 0.03%, while most direct indexing fees are in the 0.4% range. 

While this won’t make a different in the near-term, it will matter in the long-term especially as tax-loss harvesting benefits erode over time. Additionally, the slight tax benefits may be outweighed by the tax complications as each trade needs to be accounted for.

Finsum: Direct indexing is expected to grow at a faster rate than ETFs over the next decade. Yet for many investors, ETF remain the better choice.

Treasuries returned 3% in Q1 which is its best quarterly performance since 2020. In an article for Bloomberg, Liz McCormick and Michael Mackenzie covered some reasons for why this outperformance should continue. 

Three of the major factors are expectations of increased demand from Japan, a weeklong pause in auctions, and strong inflows from institutional and retail investors amid higher rates and wobbles for the banking system. 

The next major, market-moving event will be the March jobs report on Friday. Some analysts see the potential for weakness in Treasuries if there is a strong report regarding wages and jobs. This could undermine of the catalyst behind the Treasury rally - expectations that the Fed’s hiking cycle is nearly over. On the other hand, Treasuries could rally with a weak report.

Demand for Treasuries spiked amid the bank failures last month. As a result, yields for short-term notes tumbled to their lowest levels of the year with the 2-year Treasury yield declining by a 100 basis points. It also led to market expectations of the Fed terminal rate declining, while odds of the next Fed move being a cut rather than a hike, also jumped higher.

Finsum: Treasuries outperformed in Q1 with a major catalyst being bank failures which led to a surge in demand for safe-haven assets.

After a decade of low rates and abundant central bank liquidity, market conditions are going to be much more challenging over the next decade. According to Jason Xavier, Head of EMEA ETF Capital Markets at Franklin Templeton, these developments mean that a major opportunity is brewing for active fixed income ETFs. He discussed this in a post for Franklin Templeton’s Beyond Bulls & Bears publication.

While most fixed income ETFs are passive, the active category is exploding in response to the need of investors to express various views. In contrast to passive strategies, active ETFs utilize fundamental analysis and have greater discretions on which instruments they can select rather than be limited by an index. Active managers have greater flexibility to respond to a change in market conditions or external catalysts unlike passive managers. 

In the fixed income space, the ETF structure leads to increased price transparency and liquidity especially compared to traditional bond markets which are typically quite opaque. ETFs also give smaller investors access to fixed income opportunities which were typically only available to high net worth investors or institutions. 

In sum, Xavier believes active fixed income ETFs will continue to see growth as they are likely to outperform in more volatile conditions and will lead to increased transparency and liquidity in the fixed income market.

Finsum: Franklin Templeton’s Jason Xavier sees the active fixed income ETF category continuing to rapidly grow as it offers major benefits to investors.

A recent article from Morningstar’s John Rekenthaler discussed the tax benefits of direct indexing. Direct indexing is a strategy that involves directly buying the stocks of an index rather than through a fund. 

This confers several benefits such as allowing investors to gain the benefits of indexing while still being able to customize their portfolio to reflect their values and better fit their needs. Due to this, the category has exploded and gone from a niche offering solely for high net-worth investors to being offered by retail brokerages to customers for as little as $5,000.

However, the strategy is not necessarily for everyone, but it can be particularly useful for those with sizeable assets due to the potential tax benefits. This is because direct indexing results in capital losses in a separate account when stocks drop below their cost bases. The proceeds are then re-invested in stocks with similar profiles. 

This strategy can be particularly useful for investors with high federal and state taxes, large amounts of money invested in direct indexing vs other investments, short-term capital gains, and dealing with a volatile market environment. 

FinSum: Direct indexing comes with several benefits for clients but the most substantial one is the tax savings. However, it’s only worthwhile for a particular group of investors.

Short-term dated options are continuing to grow in popularity which many analysts are warning could have unintended consequences for market stability according to a Reuters article by Saqib Iqbal Ahmed.

The fastest growing segment is zero days to expiry (ODTE) options, where traders are looking to profit from small, intraday market moves. Most options are based on indices, popular ETFs, or single stocks. As of March 2022, the daily notional value of all ODTE trades had exceeded $1 trillion.

The contracts are popular among buyers, because small moves in the underlying instrument can result in huge moves for its derivatives. For sellers, the appeal is that the options decay in value and the trade can be closed at the end of the day. 

However, many warn that large positions in these options could set off a ‘squeeze’ in the event of an unexpected, intraday move. This would cause option sellers to take large losses and potentially force hedging which could exacerbate the move in the underlying instruments. According to JPMorgan, it would be a similar dynamic to the ‘Volmageddon’ crash of 2018 when many inverse volatility products crashed due to a large spike in the VIX.

Finsum: A new threat to market stability is the rise of ODTE options which are becoming very popular with retail and institutional traders. However, they do have the potential to exacerbate large, intraday market moves. 

According to Daniil Shapiro of Cerulli Associates, there is a major product development opportunity for active fixed income ETFs in the coming years. A variety of factors are behind this segment’s growing popularity including the increasing acceptance of the ETF structure, growth of advisors who are comfortable with fixed income ETFs, and rising rates which lead to increased structural demand for fixed income products.

The report was compiled by Cerulli Associates based on polling of financial advisors and was covered by Kathie O’Donnel in an article on Pensions & Investment.

The major takeaway is that use of fixed income ETFs by advisors is rapidly growing with 70% reporting use in 2022, up from 63% in 2021. Most ETF issuers pointed to greater advisor acceptance of the product and institutional demand as drivers of the ETF market. Among issuers, 66% see fixed income as their primary focus which exceeded equities at 57%. 

Overall, this survey reveals that there continues to be opportunity for ETF issuers in the active fixed income space, given rising demand. While there are plenty of options in passive fixed income, there are relatively less active options. 

Finsum: The fixed income ETF category is rapidly expanding. Within the space, passive is saturated but plenty of opportunity remain for active managers especially given expectations of rising demand in the coming years.

You’re unlikely to see fresh faces among fintech firms.

People person? Bummer, huh?

In any event, according to a major new report, according to a new report Exploring Fintech in 2023 by Erlang Solutions, driven by the tumultuous economic climate, for the year, half of all fintech firms have nipped hiring in the bud, reported yahoo.com.

Among a number of fintech employees, the first half of last year didn’t exactly smack of a Hallmark moment. From mortgage lenders to firms processing digital payments, across 45 companies, more than 4,000 saw their roles go down the drain.

Chomping at the bit to expand and fueled by factors like low interest rates, during the dawn of the pandemic, Fintechs flourished, according to Bloomberg.com. Since then, a plummet in earnings and slumping shares fueled a drop in earnings among firms.

“After several years of sky-high venture funding and more unicorn valuations than you can count on one hand, a lot of fintechs are being forced to mature and streamline more rapidly than they planned to, and job cuts are a quick way to do so,” said Charlotte Principato, financial services analyst at Morning Consult. “This was bound to happen at some point.”

In recent years, third party model portfolios, of course, have experienced stunning growth, according to wisdomtree.com.

But – and isn’t there often one? – their ability to leverage the models in their practice have been questioned by advisors.

Tapping into insights complied from the WisdomTree Third-Party Model Portfolios Research Study, concerns among advisors include wondering which of their clients are a good fit for third-party models. 

An idea: kick things off with clientele who especially take to third party models.

By tapping model portfolios, advisors can expend more time on activities that involve direct interaction with clients, according to ssga.com. It goes a long way toward bucking up their satisfaction and “wallet share growth.”

The management of portfolios, a gaggle of advisors continue to believe, is at the core of their value. Then there’s the cold reality: the upside of specialized expertise is burgeoning among individual investors. In dispensing comprehensive advice, it’s paramount for advisors to maintain a degree of knowledge across a range of topics. That impacts the time they can invest in activities revolving around the portfolio.

According to an article by Todd Rosenblum of ETFTrends, a survey of financial advisors revealed that 68% of financial advisors gain fixed income exposure for clients through bond mutual funds, followed by bond ETFs at 61% and individual bonds at 58%. 

Yet, the category continues to grow at an impressive rate with about $45 billion of inflows into US-listed bond ETFs. In total, bond ETFs have $1.3 trillion in assets which comprises 20% of the overall base, indicating more room for growth. 

Some of the major advantages of bond funds such as ETFs or mutual funds are increased diversification and opportunities to enhance returns which can’t be found when buying individual bonds. 

Bond funds can even be bought with a specific maturity date when your client may have a need for liquidity. It also avoids the risk of a credit downgrade or default which is elevated in an individual security. Another is that bond ETFs are much more liquid and with tighter spreads than individual bonds. Additionally, many of the most liquid and popular fixed income ETFs invest in hundreds of bonds issued by high-quality companies. 

Finsum: Fixed income ETFs are a fast growing category but still trail behind fixed income mutual funds in terms of popularity with advisors. However, it does offer major benefits compared to investing in individual bonds.

Regulators are looking to get more aggressive about enforcement of Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) which was passed in 2020. Regulators are particularly focused on sales practices to ensure that fiduciary standards are followed according to a Thomson Reuters article by Richard Satran.

Reg BI mandates that recommendations are offered with impartial advice and explanation of alternatives, including to competing firms. Along with the SEC, Reg BI has also been adopted by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). 

One challenge for firms and regulators is that automated monitoring of transactions to ensure compliance is lacking. According to Parham Nasseri, VP in product and regulatory strategy at compliance software developer InvestorCOM, Inc: “Putting the risk assessments into a surveillance system for Reg BI compliance involves significantly more challenges than the kind of monitoring that systems have done in the past.” 

New elements to monitor include conflicts of interest, customer profiles, costs, alternative investments, and other client-specific factors. Along with the technological challenges, firms will have to comply with new exam requirements to comply with new sales practice rules. 

Finsum: Reg BI was passed in 2020 but regulators were slow to begin aggressive enforcement given the pandemic. This is changing and firms will be forced to rapidly update sales practices, training, and monitoring.