Displaying items by tag: income

With recession warnings growing louder, elevated bond yields are offering a compelling entry point for fixed income investors. During times of rising recession risk, bonds often shine as a defensive play—prices typically climb as demand surges and yields fall, making today's higher yields especially attractive to lock in. 

UBS highlights that quality, investment-grade bonds are offering strong yield potential without pushing investors into riskier territory. The Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF (NBFC) stands out as one such vehicle, combining active management with multi-sector exposure to generate consistent income with reduced volatility. 

With a 7.10% 30-day SEC yield and over 350 holdings, NBFC delivers both competitive returns and cost efficiency, making it a strong candidate in today's income-hungry environment.

Finsum: Still, for those seeking more income and broader diversification, a mix of bonds and credit assets—like emerging market debt or private credit—can provide a powerful balance.

With U.S. GDP dipping negative in Q1 and tariffs clouding the policy outlook, concerns are mounting over how resilient the American consumer truly is. Rising credit card delinquencies point to financial strain, especially among lower-income, lower-FICO borrowers, while looser post-pandemic underwriting standards and inflation have only added pressure. 

In contrast, higher-income consumers—especially homeowners—have largely weathered the storm, thanks in part to low fixed-rate mortgages and tighter lending practices in recent years. 

This divergence is pushing savvy investors to focus on more defensive segments like asset-backed residential credit and small business loans with strong underwriting. While these may offer slightly lower yields, they come with greater resilience and the potential for long-term stability amid an increasingly bifurcated market. 

Finsum: As credit performance grows more uneven, navigating this environment requires a sharper eye on borrower quality and a flexible, informed investment approach.

As interest rate hikes pause, short-term bond funds remain a compelling option for investors seeking steady income with limited rate sensitivity. These funds, which invest in government and corporate debt maturing within five years, can provide attractive yields while minimizing the downside of rate volatility. 

Ideal for short-term goals, they offer better returns than savings accounts without the higher risk of longer-duration bonds or equities. Top picks in this category include SPDR Portfolio Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPSB), iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB), Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ), Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV), and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX)—all offering yields north of 4%, with low expenses. 

While short-term bonds aren’t risk-free, they’re a smart choice for investors looking to park cash with a time horizon of three to five years.

Finsum:  As always, cost matters—opt for funds with lower fees to maximize net returns.

In a market rattled by volatility in both stocks and bonds, dividend ETFs are drawing attention as a middle ground between growth and income strategies. While passive giants like Vanguard’s VIG and Schwab’s SCHD dominate with low fees and broad exposure, a growing number of active ETFs—like T. Rowe Price’s TDVG—are betting they can outperform by handpicking high-quality dividend payers. 

TDVG blends income with potential capital appreciation and holds familiar names like Apple and Microsoft, offering tech exposure without overconcentration. Active managers argue their flexibility allows them to adapt to changing market conditions in ways passive index funds cannot, especially when navigating risks like dividend cuts or sector shifts. 

Although passive dividend ETFs still attract more investor flows due to cost advantages, actively managed funds are slowly gaining traction, particularly among investors seeking income stability amid rising macroeconomic uncertainty. 

Finsum: For those dependent on income—like retirees—dividend strategies remain appealing, but experts caution that yield alone shouldn’t drive decisions.

The rise of fee-based annuities is accelerating as insurance firms respond to evolving regulations, especially in light of the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule. These products, which charge transparent annual fees instead of embedded commissions, are designed to better align with client interests and reduce potential conflicts. 

However, while fee-based annuities may suit some investors, others—particularly long-term holders—might benefit more from commission-based options due to lower lifetime costs. 

Commissionable annuities, despite carrying higher built-in expenses, can eliminate ongoing advisory fees and may be better suited for clients who need less active management. Choosing between the two depends on several factors, including the annuity's fee structure, potential need for liquidity, and whether features like living benefits are added. 

Finsum: Ultimately, advisors and clients must carefully weigh these trade-offs to determine the best fit based on individual goals, timelines, and financial preferences.