Displaying items by tag: alts

Blackstone’s flagship private credit fund, BCRED, is issuing $500 million of five-year investment-grade bonds, expected to yield about 1.6 percentage points above Treasuries. 

The sale comes after BCRED’s $1 billion issuance in January and follows a $650 million note deal from Ares Management’s BDC earlier this week. Goldman Sachs’s BDC is also preparing a potential offering as business development companies take advantage of renewed investor demand. 

These firms, which lend to small and midsize companies, are tapping the market before earnings blackout periods begin. Issuance overall has surged, with 27 companies selling $43 billion of debt Tuesday, the third-largest daily volume on record. Barclays, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, RBC, and Wells Fargo are managing the deal, with proceeds earmarked for general corporate purposes.

Finsum: The timing of this private credit move is worth monitoring, as it could have implication for earnings season. 

Advisors facing heightened U.S. market volatility are increasingly turning to global infrastructure ETFs as a way to diversify portfolios and hedge against policy risks. Structural growth drivers like demographic shifts, and supportive government policies, such as Germany’s recent multi-billion-dollar funding initiatives are supportive. 

The sector also has a history of resilience during inflationary periods, as infrastructure companies provide essential services that can pass costs on to consumers. One option is the BNY Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI), which actively invests in global infrastructure firms with strong cash flows, balance sheets, and growth prospects. 

BKGI aims to deliver a forward yield of 6% or higher by focusing on dividend-paying companies, with about one-third of assets in U.S. holdings and the rest diversified across Europe and beyond. 

Finsum: Infrastructure exposure offers low correlation with U.S. equities, especially when considering outside options. 

UBS strategists have warned that the artificial intelligence boom, fueled heavily by private credit firms and lenders, is raising the risk of overheating in the sector. Private credit, once focused on smaller businesses, has expanded rapidly into big tech, with tech-sector debt from non-bank lenders surging nearly 29%—or $100 billion—in the past year. 

The warning echoes concerns from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who recently cautioned that excitement around AI may be inflating a bubble. UBS noted that while this influx of capital could support hyperscaler growth plans, it may also create vulnerabilities if assets sour or growth slows. 

Tech giants including Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet are projected to spend $344 billion in 2025, much of it on AI-driven infrastructure such as data centers. 

Finsum: With private credit now deeply embedded in the sector, analysts caution that investors should carefully monitor risks alongside the sector’s breakneck growth.

Structured notes are often pitched as sophisticated tools for yield and downside protection, but they carry layers of risks that can outweigh their potential benefits. Because they are debt obligations of the issuing bank, their value hinges on the issuer’s creditworthiness, leaving investors vulnerable in the event of a default. 

High, often hidden, fees further erode returns, with some products charging over 2% annually on top of advisor commissions. Liquidity is another concern, as structured notes rarely trade in active markets, forcing early sellers to accept steep discounts. 

Their complex payoff structures can also mislead investors into believing they hold principal protection when in reality protections are conditional and limited. Tax treatment is murky as well, with many products generating taxable “phantom income,” creating unexpected burdens that make structured notes a risky choice for most retail investors. 

Finsum: While structured notes are perfect for lots of investors illiquidity and complexity that may leave investors worse off than with simpler, more transparent options.

In the evolving “post-60/40” investing landscape, alternatives often come with higher fees and reduced liquidity, but investors tolerate these trade-offs for the potential of higher returns and skilled management. Wealth managers stress that allocations should reflect an investor’s liquidity needs, risk tolerance, and experience, with recommendations ranging from a cautious 10% to as high as 50% for those with no short-term cash flow requirements. 

While some, like Marina Wealth’s Noah Damsky, seek niche managers with unique strategies, others—such as International Assets Advisory’s Ed Cofrancesco—favor straightforward private real estate projects for their simplicity and transparency. 

Ballast Rock Private Wealth’s Andrew Mescon highlights private credit and private equity secondaries as compelling opportunities, citing diversification, downside protection, and discounts to net asset value as advantages. Managers also note the growing role of evergreen fund structures, which can ease liquidity constraints and broaden access to these asset classes. 

Finsum: Ultimately, successful alternative investing hinges on aligning product complexity, fees, and liquidity with each investor’s unique financial situation.